![]() ![]()
#EVERNOTE DESKTOP SAME WINDOW PDF#Create text / pdf version and store in Dropbox-based filing cabinet system (which I would LOVE to put in Evernote, but my mind works the way a filing cabinet does - alphabetical and nested layers, so a plain old file-system works best).put note link / idea on Incubating List.(optionally) create named note, store in cabinet notebook.copy note link into Projects List (sometimes Waiting-For List)ĭecide on first physical action, add to Actions List.Part of daily / weekly processing means going through my inbox notebook to decide where that item should go.Ĭreate a named note for that project, store in cabinet notebook These live in 'Cabinet'Īn 'Inbox' notebook to capture everything (ideas, forwarded emails, etc)Ī 'Cabinet' notebook for long term storage that I keep track of via search and note links I use tags and saved search/shortcuts to keep everything separate.Ī 'gtd' tag with multiple notes (actions, projects, waiting-for, incubating, horizon, to-read, already-read, and a few others). I implement a custom version of GTD in evernote. #EVERNOTE DESKTOP SAME WINDOW WINDOWS#I guess I will have to continue using my MacBook only because of Evernote! At least it means I get to run 3 OS's (OSX, Windows and Chrome) on one machine :-)Īs a concrete example of why multiple main windows are required: So, I can only guess that Evernote for OSX is newer (?) which is why, IMHO, it is a superior version of the desktop version. #EVERNOTE DESKTOP SAME WINDOW CODE#Microsoft re-wrote Windows code at least twice and it didn't get it right every time (e.g. The article you posted talks about Technical Inflation.ĭidn't think about Evernote code being old! I am not familiar with Evernote release history (I have only been using Evernote since 2013), but I am familiar with the rather daunting task of having to decide (and convince sponsors) that a code base needs a total rewrite. Such a version would definitely be lacking in features for some time, which would create a huge backlash like it did with the attempt to renew the web version. Well considering the context of the thread, I'm pretty sure it's the former.Įvernote for Windows is old code that limits future development, and the more investments put into the old code with bug fixing and new features etc., the harder it is to motivate completely re-doing the Windows version from scratch. * I'm planning to introduce this in financial circles too - money is only symbols, right? Either way the key phrase is "taking some time" which tends to suggest there is NO such thing as 'a quick fix'. Either EN are in that technical debt* and have to take some time to figure a way around it, or (my favourite) they are making sure they are trying to avoid being in it - by taking some time to figure the most likely way around it. Me bein' a glass-half-full kinda guy (I'm happy and drowning rather than miserable with it.) I thought you could take that comment in two ways. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |